In: Organon F, vol. 27, no. 2
Miklós Márton - János Tőzsér
Year, pages: 2020, 169 - 186
mental fictionalism; folk psychology; mental antirealism; verificationism; conceptual dependence.
Article type: Research Article
In this paper, we defend the main claims of our earlier paper “Mental Fictionalism as an Undermotivated Theory” (in The Monist) from Gábor Bács’s criticism, which appeared in his “Mental fictionalism and epiphenomenal qualia” (in Dialectica). In our earlier paper, we tried to show that mental fictionalism is an undermotivated theory, so there is no good reason to give up the realist approach to the folk psychological discourse. The core of Bács’s criticism consists in that our argumentation rests on an equivocation concerning the folk psychological concepts of conscious experiences. In our present argumentation, at first, we shortly recapitulate our earlier argumentation and Bács’s main objection to it. After that, we argue against the case of equivocation, claiming that it rests on a highly implausible and unsupported verificationist approach. Lastly, in answering another remark of Bács’s, we discuss the possibility of a realist mental fictionalism and conclude that it is an incoherent standpoint.
How to cite:
Márton, M., Tőzsér, J. 2020. In Defence of the Phenomenological Objection to Mental Fictionalism. In Organon F, vol. 27, no.2, pp. 169-186. 1335-0668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2020.27202
Márton, M., Tőzsér, J. (2020). In Defence of the Phenomenological Objection to Mental Fictionalism. Organon F, 27(2), 169-186. 1335-0668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2020.27202
Publisher: Filozofický ústav SAV, Filosofický ústav AVČR
Published: 2. 5. 2020
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.