Facebook Instagram Twitter RSS Feed Back to top on side


In: Filozofia, vol. 75, no. 2
Lukáš Bielik
Rok, strany: 2020, 91 - 108
Jazyk: slo
Kľúčové slová:
Argument – Argument-evaluation – Argument-reconstruction – Plurality of reconstructions – Selection principles
Typ článku: State / Original Articles
Typ dokumentu: Časopis / Journal
O článku:
Arguments formulated in a natural or scientific language usually allow for various different reconstructions. Alternative reconstructions may pertain to different approaches to inference and argumentation (such as classical predicate logic, Bayesian epistemology and many others). However, how are we to select one from among various available reconstructions? The paper provides an analysis of three different reconstructions of a particular argument and discusses their pros and cons with respect to several logical and extra-logical properties. Moreover, the three potential selection principles are considered. It is argued that they work adequately only when subjected to a specific aim of the context of argument reconstruction.
Ako citovať:
ISO 690:
Bielik, L. 2020. MOŽNOSTI REKONŠTRUKCIE, ANALÝZY A HODNOTENIA ARGUMENTOV. In Filozofia, vol. 75, no.2, pp. 91-108. 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.2.2

Bielik, L. (2020). MOŽNOSTI REKONŠTRUKCIE, ANALÝZY A HODNOTENIA ARGUMENTOV. Filozofia, 75(2), 91-108. 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.2.2
O vydaní:
Vydavateľ: Filozofický ústav SAV / Institute of Phillosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
Publikované: 4. 3. 2020
Verejná licencia:
Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution NonCommercial
Creative Commons 4.0. Attribution NonCommercial