Facebook Instagram Twitter RSS Feed PodBean Back to top on side

Polarizované diskurzy týkajúce sa aktuálnych spoločenských tém

In: Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, vol. 42, no. 5
Miroslav Popper

Details:

Year, pages: 2010, 564 - 583
Keywords:
social and moral norms, polarized discourses, current societal topics, moral intuitions
Article type: štúdia / study
About article:
Polarized Discourses Relating to Topical Social Issues. The paper analyzes function, diversity, and the evolution of social norms and moral intuitions that play an important role in the process of important societal issues judgement. On the basis of the results from a representative survey it analyzes responses to seven polarized discourses relating to the topical social issues. Concretely: 1. large vs. small measure of the state’s involvement in providing help for its citizens; 2. inviolability of private property vs. state’s activities in public interest; 3. woman’s reproductive rights (including the right to choose abortion) vs. the right of a foetus to life, 4. right to euthanasia, 5. legal vs. illegal means used by citizens trying to meet their requirements; 6. ecological vs. economic positions in state investments; 7. progressive vs. flat tax. Results that are analyzed are those in which statistically relevant differences between demographical characteristics of population, such as the level of education, age, gender, nationality, religion, income, the size of settlement as well as election preferences, were shown. In addition to the results obtained, focus is on the role of moral intuitions in judging polarized topics. The aim of this paper is to emphasize that in addition to rational arguments and deliberation, the way of their presentation, rhetoric, which can evoke in people different emotional reactions and thus also tendency to different answers are also very important for framing and solving social problems. Sociológia 2010, Vol. 42 (No. 5: 564-583)
Polarized Discourses Relating to Topical Social Issues. The paper analyzes function, diversity, and the evolution of social norms and moral intuitions that play an important role in the process of important societal issues judgement. On the basis of the results from a representative survey it analyzes responses to seven polarized discourses relating to the topical social issues. Concretely: 1. large vs. small measure of the state’s involvement in providing help for its citizens; 2. inviolability of private property vs. state’s activities in public interest; 3. woman’s reproductive rights (including the right to choose abortion) vs. the right of a foetus to life, 4. right to euthanasia, 5. legal vs. illegal means used by citizens trying to meet their requirements; 6. ecological vs. economic positions in state investments; 7. progressive vs. flat tax. Results that are analyzed are those in which statistically relevant differences between demographical characteristics of population, such as the level of education, age, gender, nationality, religion, income, the size of settlement as well as election preferences, were shown. In addition to the results obtained, focus is on the role of moral intuitions in judging polarized topics. The aim of this paper is to emphasize that in addition to rational arguments and deliberation, the way of their presentation, rhetoric, which can evoke in people different emotional reactions and thus also tendency to different answers are also very important for framing and solving social problems. Sociológia 2010, Vol. 42 (No. 5: 564-583)
How to cite:
ISO 690:
Popper, M. 2010. Polarizované diskurzy týkajúce sa aktuálnych spoločenských tém. In Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, vol. 42, no.5, pp. 564-583. 0049-1225.

APA:
Popper, M. (2010). Polarizované diskurzy týkajúce sa aktuálnych spoločenských tém. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, 42(5), 564-583. 0049-1225.