Facebook Instagram Twitter RSS Feed PodBean Back to top on side

Percepcia nerovností a príčin chudoby na Slovensku

In: Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, vol. 37, no. 5
Katarína Strapcová

Details:

Year, pages: 2005, 419 - 448
Keywords:
Social inequality; poverty perception; solidarity
Article type: Štúdia / Study
About article:
Perceptions on Inequality and on the Causes of Poverty in Slovakia. In this paper, popular perceptions on inequality and on the causes of poverty in Slovakia are analysed. The paper begins with the assumption that recognising popular perceptions will enable us to identify how socially marginalized people are represented in our society and what kinds of social policy measures are perceived as appropriate by the public. Our theoretical concept is based on a two dimensional typology with four basic types of poverty explanation: 1. individual blame or blaming-the-poor approach, 2. social blame or blaming-the-state approach, 3. individual fate and 4. social fate. In addition to an empirical analysis, an assessment is made as to whether perceptions are shaped by basic principles present in the judgment process (self-interest, i.e. the underdog principle, or enlightenment principle). The dynamics of changes in public opinion are examined through available comparative datasets (European Values Study 1991 and 1999, Society 2004). The results show that the individual socio-economic position has an effect on the preferred explanation of poverty causes. The higher the socio-economic position, the more stigmatising the opinion. Sociológia 2005, Vol. 37 (No. 5: 419-448)
Perceptions on Inequality and on the Causes of Poverty in Slovakia. In this paper, popular perceptions on inequality and on the causes of poverty in Slovakia are analysed. The paper begins with the assumption that recognising popular perceptions will enable us to identify how socially marginalized people are represented in our society and what kinds of social policy measures are perceived as appropriate by the public. Our theoretical concept is based on a two dimensional typology with four basic types of poverty explanation: 1. individual blame or blaming-the-poor approach, 2. social blame or blaming-the-state approach, 3. individual fate and 4. social fate. In addition to an empirical analysis, an assessment is made as to whether perceptions are shaped by basic principles present in the judgment process (self-interest, i.e. the underdog principle, or enlightenment principle). The dynamics of changes in public opinion are examined through available comparative datasets (European Values Study 1991 and 1999, Society 2004). The results show that the individual socio-economic position has an effect on the preferred explanation of poverty causes. The higher the socio-economic position, the more stigmatising the opinion. Sociológia 2005, Vol. 37 (No. 5: 419-448)
How to cite:
ISO 690:
Strapcová, K. 2005. Percepcia nerovností a príčin chudoby na Slovensku. In Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, vol. 37, no.5, pp. 419-448. 0049-1225.

APA:
Strapcová, K. (2005). Percepcia nerovností a príčin chudoby na Slovensku. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, 37(5), 419-448. 0049-1225.