Facebook Instagram Twitter RSS Feed PodBean Back to top on side

Idiografická nebo nomotetická koncepce v geografii: kontraproduktivní spor o povahu a podstatu poznání

In: Geografický časopis, vol. 60, no. 3
Luděk Sýkora
Detaily:
Rok, strany: 2008, 299 - 315
Kľúčové slová:
geographic organization, nature of geography, idiographic, nomothetic
O článku:
The paper reacts to recent contributions of Czech and Slovak geographers to the debate about the role of idiographic and nomothetic conceptions in geographic inquiry and understanding. This kind of debate has been overcome in Western geography. The idiographic and nomothetic conceptions deal with the nature of description of geographical facts and do not offer an adequate framework for their explanation. The paper documents shortcomings of the debate looking at three examples: Hartshorne/Schaefer’s discussion about exceptionalism in geography, the theory of geographical organization of Hampl and the concept of the hybrid idiographic-nomothetic nature of geography proposed by Matlovič. It concludes that retaining the prominent position of the issues of nomothetic and idiographic types of inquiry would rather obstruct than stimulate further disciplinary development in our geography.
Ako citovať:
ISO 690:
Sýkora, L. 2008. Idiografická nebo nomotetická koncepce v geografii: kontraproduktivní spor o povahu a podstatu poznání. In Geografický časopis, vol. 60, no.3, pp. 299-315. 0016-7193.

APA:
Sýkora, L. (2008). Idiografická nebo nomotetická koncepce v geografii: kontraproduktivní spor o povahu a podstatu poznání. Geografický časopis, 60(3), 299-315. 0016-7193.