In: Filozofia, vol. 80, no. 3
Ivo Dragoun
Detaily:
Strany: 441 - 452
Jazyk: cze
Kľúčové slová:
analytic philosophy – continental philosophy – division –
methodology
Typ článku: Diskusia / Discussion
Typ dokumentu: časopis / journal
O článku:
In his On the Very Analytic-Continental Division in Philosophy, Šebela presents three objections against dividing contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental. He calls them a factual objection, a methodological objection, and a power objection. In this paper, I will scrutinize the three objections and show that each of them ultimately fails. My motivation is to clear the theoretical path for those who wish to explore and reflect on the fascinating methodological presuppositions that constitute the division of contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental.
Ako citovať:
ISO 690:
Dragoun, I. 2025. Filozofie analytická vs. kontinentální: na obranu dělení. In Filozofia, vol. 80, no.3, pp. 441-452. ISSN 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2025.80.3.12
APA:
Dragoun, I. (2025). Filozofie analytická vs. kontinentální: na obranu dělení. Filozofia, 80(3), 441-452. ISSN 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2025.80.3.12
O vydaní:
Vydavateľ: Filozofický ústav SAV, v. v. i. / Institute of Philosophy SAS, v. v. i.
Publikované: 12. 5. 2025
Verejná licencia:
