Facebook Instagram Twitter RSS Feed PodBean Back to top on side

Na obranu vágnosti

In: Filozofia, vol. 76, no. 4
Andrej Demúth - Marek Števček
Detaily:
Rok, strany: 2021, 237 - 251
Jazyk: slo
Kľúčové slová:
Vagueness – Ontological – Epistemicism – Semantic – Contextualism – Meaning
Typ článku: State / Original Articles
Typ dokumentu: Časopis / Journal
O článku:
Philosophers often consider vagueness (a linguistic expressions admits of unclear or borderline cases of application) to be an undesirable phenomenon. The authors of the text reject the exi stence of ontological vagueness, and, in cooperation with T. Williamson, they find the roots of vagueness in insufficient understanding. Apart from epistemological vagueness, though, they advocate for the existence of semantic vagueness, stemming from the ambiguity and inconsistency of boundaries and ranges of linguistic expressions. While agreeing with the impossibility of complete elimination of semantic vagueness, the authors point to its possible advantage in daily communication and its possible progressiveness in the search for newer, better understanding.
Ako citovať:
ISO 690:
Demúth, A., Števček, M. 2021. Na obranu vágnosti. In Filozofia, vol. 76, no.4, pp. 237-251. 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.4.1

APA:
Demúth, A., Števček, M. (2021). Na obranu vágnosti. Filozofia, 76(4), 237-251. 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.4.1
O vydaní:
Vydavateľ: Filozofický ústav SAV / Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
Publikované: 17. 4. 2021
Verejná licencia:
Creative Commons License
Toto dielo je licencované pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License