In: Filozofia, vol. 75, no. 9
Details:
Year, pages: 2020, 760 - 775
Language: slo
Keywords:
Epistemic normativity – Metaepistemology – Naturalistic epistemology –
Philosophical skepticism – W. V. O. Quine
Article type: State / Original Articles
Document type: Časopis / Journal
About article:
The problem of skepticism is one of the central problems in traditional epistemology
which has its place also in contemporary analytically oriented epistemology.
However, from the point of view of naturalized epistemology, skepticism
is shifting to the periphery of interest. The subject of the paper is the relationship
between skepticism and naturalism, which in contemporary epistemology
are understood as opposing positions. Attention is focused on the critique
of philosophical skepticism from the naturalistic perspective, as well as on
the critique of the naturalistic reaction to skepticism from antinaturalist positions.
The aim of the study is to clarify the main points of the dispute between
the traditional approach and the naturalistic approach to knowledge inspired by
Quine, with special regard to the problem of skepticism. The intention is to
demonstrate that the dispute between traditional and naturalistic epistemology is
not primarily concerned with skepticism, but it is a metaepistemological dispute
concerning the nature or the very possibility and legitimacy of epistemology as
a philosophical study in which the issue of epistemic normativity plays a central
role.
How to cite:
ISO 690:
Szapuová, M., Nuhlíček, M. 2020. Naturalizmus a skepticizmus. In Filozofia, vol. 75, no.9, pp. 760-775. 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.9.3
APA:
Szapuová, M., Nuhlíček, M. (2020). Naturalizmus a skepticizmus. Filozofia, 75(9), 760-775. 0046-385X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.9.3
About edition:
Publisher: Filozofický ústav SAV / Institute of Phillosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
Published: 18. 11. 2020
Rights: